Friday, May 9, 2025

A CONDENSED HISTORY OF JAMES J. STRANG

 A  CONDENSED  HISTORY  OF JAMES  J.  STRANG

As printed in the Standard-Press, Burlington, Wis., Oct. 17, 1963

By, Donna Falk, Teacher

He was any one of a dozen different men, this man; depending on which of the thousands whose lives he has affected is discussing him.

He was either a superb orator and a profound scholar, or he was a charlatan and a caitiff.

He was either a thief who richly merited a long term in prison, which he never served, or he was a saint who spent his life in service to his fellow man.

He was either unscrupulous, a growing political power to be feared, or he was a talented political leader whose sole motivation was genuine regard for the true interests of the people and the obligations of his official oath.

But on one thing all agreed: he was an incredible man.

His name was James Jesse Strang, though most people who spoke to him called him either “Prophet” or “King”. Behind his back he was called everything from a traitor to the United States to a blasphemer of God’s name. He was a man of medium stature, five feet seven inches tall, with sandy-red hair and prominent features, of German-Jewish descent. At 31, he began a fabulous career which made him loved by some and hated by others. Even now, a century since his death, his name still stands for good or for evil.  Articles, constantly appearing in newspapers and magazines, repeating the testimony of his bitterest enemies, are continually being refuted by followers still faithful to the religion he claimed to have re-established under the direction of Almighty God. However, no purely historical account exists dealing with his accomplishments during those 12 years.

His Education

 It is interesting to note that though Mr. Strang procured only the bare rudiments of an education in the miserable county schools of old New York state where he was born, he studied law at home and was finally admitted to the bar of Chautauqua county, New York, in October, 1836.  Dr. Milo M. Quaife, historian, said that, “to some men, however, is given the ability to acquire knowledge without the aid of formal schooling; Abraham Lincoln was one such person, and Jesse. J. Strang was another.”

Although Strang could undoubtedly have had a brilliant law career in New York, he felt there would be advantages for a young lawyer on the newer frontier of Wisconsin, and consequently he removed to Burlington, in the summer of 1843. Here he became the law partner of Caleb. P. Barnes, facing a promising future until he came into intimate connection with members of the Mormon faith through his marriage to Mary Perce whose sister was the wife of Moses Smith, an ardent Mormon elder. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Strang recognized the verity of Mormonism and with Aaron Smith, brother Moses Smith, journeyed to Nauvoo, Illinois, in February, 1844.

Under the personal instruction of Joseph and Hyrum Smith and Sidney Rigdon, at this time the three highest officers of Mormonism, Mr. Strang quickly became a convert to the faith. A proficient orator, possessed of a brilliant mind and equipped with a fund of information, he evidently made a strong impression upon the Mormon leaders. He was soon baptized and ordained to the ministry, and with Aaron Smith was delegated to investigate the country of Wisconsin as a possible future site for a Mormon city. This done, on May 24, 1844, Strang mailed his report to Joseph Smith at Nauvoo, setting forth minutely the advantages of building a Mormon town near Burlington.

Smith Killed

However, before the response to this letter reached Strang, the Mormon leader, Joseph Smith, was killed by a mob on June 27, 1844, while being held in protective custody in the jail at Carthage, Illinois.  At the very moment Joseph was dying in Illinois, James J. Strang claimed an angel of God appeared to him in Wisconsin, “accompanied by a numerous heavenly train,” and anointed his head with oil, divinely ordained him to the same prophetic office which Joseph had held. When the letter from Joseph Smith did reach him, it was sufficiently startling to cause an internal dissension with the Mormon church. The former prophet wrote, “If evil befall me, thou [Strang] shalt lead the flock to pleasant pastures,...and to [you]shall the gathering of the people be, for [you] shall plant a stake of Zion in Wisconsin.”

Brigham Young and others of the Council of the Twelve refused to acknowledge either this letter or the leadership of Strang, although according to the letter Strang claimed came from Joseph Smith, the Lord said, “Now I command my servants, the apostles and priests and elders of the Church of the Saints, that they communicate and proclaim this, my word, to all the saints of God in all the world; that they may be gathered unto and round about the city of Voree and be saved from their enemies, for I will have a people to serve me.”

From this time forward the ministerial duties of Mr. Strang consumed most of his time and his fame spread across the nation. His name was upon the lips of every Mormon, and although Brigham Young held the reins of power in Nauvoo and by means of threats and cajoling persuaded most of the Mormons to follow him, Strang succeeded in establishing the city of Voree near Burlington, Wisconsin, with about 3,000 inhabitants.

Revelation

In 1846, he claimed to have received a revelation from God in which he “beheld a land amidst wide waters, with a deep, broad bay on one side of it” and was told that “here shall God establish his people,” and “from thence shall the gospel of the Kingdom go unto the tribes, and they shall not any more be despised.” He recognized in this revelation that the land “amidst wide waters” was the islands of Lake Michigan, and accordingly, on May 11, 1847, he and four others arrived at Beaver Island south of the Straits of Mackinac, to explore it, and prepare for settlement. It is worthy of remark that they were so destitute of means for the undertaking that they were obliged to sell their blankets to pay their passage on the little hooker that landed them there and went ashore with less than two days’ provision and not one cent of money. They were not well received at the local trading houses so they went into the woods, made a camp of hemlock boughs, and commenced a thorough exploration of the island, living principally on leeks and beechnuts.

This perseverance in a frontier community, where men who would work at all were rare, soon got them employment, a stock of provisions, and the use of a boat.  After making most thorough exploration of the group of islands and building a cabin, Strang and two of his companions returned to Voree. Two others, Gurdon Brown and R. Frederick Mills, remained and were the first Mormons settled on Beaver Island. In the course of the summer several families moved to the island, but some became dissatisfied with the prospects and left. At the setting in of winter, the Mormon population consisted of five men and their families--in all, 18 persons. The city of St. James became the headquarters of the church, and by 1850, Strang had established the island as a kingdom and had been ordained as King in Zion. This title of “King” was no more a threat to the sovereignty of the United States and its democratic way of life than is the title “Monsignor” given to Catholic prelates today.

Polygamy

The establishment of the law and organization of the kingdom brought with it polygamy, which was practiced according to the following law: “Thou shalt not take unto thee a multitude of wives disproportioned to thy inheritance, and thy substance; nor shalt thou take wives to vex those thou hast; neither shalt thou put away one to take another.”

Elvira Field, Betsy McNutt, Sarah and Phoebe Wright joined the family of Mr. Strang successively in the order given. Children were born to him posthumously by all these women. In all, Mary Perce, his first wife, bore the prophet four children, Elvira Field, four, Betsy McNutt, four, Sarah and Phoebe Wright, one each.

Sarah Wright, questioned years afterward concerning the family relationship in Strang’s polygamous home, answered: “You ask if we all lived in the same house. We did, but had separate rooms, and all met in prayer and ate at the same table. [Strang] was a very mild-spoken, kind man to his family, although his word was law. We were all honest in our religion and made things as pleasant as possible. There were four of us living in one house.”  And more recently, Mark A. Strang, grandson of James, wrote: “My grandmother, Sarah, was the physician in charge at my birth and was an intimate and confiding friend for more than a quarter of a century. She never ceased to praise James, especially his gentleness, sincerity, kindness and brilliance, and related many incidents to illustrate. She would always end our conversations about him with this simple statement, ‘He was a good man.’ Possibly you did not know that she studied medicine after the assassination and lived out a long useful life as a practicing physician devoted to the service of mankind as was James.”

Although a few other men among his membership also practiced polygamy, after the prophet’s death the practice was discontinued. His followers subscribe to a commandment of God given in the “Book of Mormon” which says polygamy can only be practiced by direct revelation from God: “...if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me [by polygamy], I will command my people...” After the Saints were driven from their inheritances by the Gentiles, the social order necessary for the well working of the institution was not possible without a prophet to receive continued revelation on the subject. Unlike the Mormons, who followed Brigham Young, and were prosecuted for breaking the laws of the land in practicing polygamy, the followers of Strang did not break the law, none yet being passed; by the time a law was passed against polygamy there were no Strangites following this practice.

During the summer of 1850, the Mormon immigration was considerable, and by 1855, they occupied and had exclusive control of the counties of Manatee and Emmett, and the township of Bremen in Chipped county, Michigan, with a population of 1,700 souls.

All Not Well

But all did not go well with the Mormons. As early as 1850, a full-scale attempt was made by the local fishermen to drive them from Beaver Island. This failed as a result of Strang’s shrewdness. They were charged with being a lawless band of banditti, and by 1851, feelings against the Mormons had run so high that a man by the name of Granger “offered a reward for [Strang’s] head. The reward offered at first was but twenty-five dollars.” Then, as the idea grew of getting rid of this man who by his mere presence was bringing law and order to a wild community, the stakes went higher. From $25 the reward shot up to $300. This was big money and Strang was hunted for four weeks by bands of armed men, Indians and half-breeds, Irish, other settlers, varying from 75 to 350 in number at the prospect of success increased or diminished. Most of those men doubtless fully believed that the advertisement would legally justify them in killing Strang, but some there were who simply knew this was a convenient season to get rid of a man with a conscience, a man who stood in the way of their plans. They hoped to get him murdered quietly so, they could to back to their lawless ways, and there is not the slightest doubt that had they succeeded in killing him then, the result would have verified these opinions. The murderers would never have been prosecuted. When the reward did not bring about his death, they tried other means.

One accuser and another charged James Jesse Strang, the mild-tempered, sandy-haired Mormon prophet with treason, robbing the U.S. mails, counterfeiting, plundering his neighbor’s goods, horse stealing, and other gross atrocities. However, though he was prosecuted over a hundred times in the courts of the United States at Mackinac and Detroit, Michigan, between 1850, and his death in 1856, he was discharged as innocent every single time. Moreover, through all the trials and persecutions he managed to maintain his seat in the House of Representatives in Michigan for two terms, 1852-54 and 1855-56, although he was constantly harassed by the many times he was arrested and brought to trial on these unprovable charges.

An example of this can be found in the columns of the Pontiac Jacksonian of January 11, 1853:  “The Mormon prophet Strang, more familiarly known as King Strang, was yesterday arrested by a Detroit officer upon a bench warrant. Strang claimed his privilege as a member and sustained his position in an able speech. His arrest he attributed to malice, and the position was sustained by strong proof. The house today discharged him from arrest, in spite of a strong and powerful prejudice against him.”

Such arrests and releases were familiar to Mr. Strang and to the other members of his congregation. Their religion was unfamiliar, different, and therefore frightening, and they refused to compromise with their consciences. At one time 99 Mormon men had been arrested and were waiting trial in the court at Detroit. But as often as they were arrested they were released as innocent of the crimes charged against them. Evidence of this occurs in an article appearing in the New York Daily tribune of July 2, 1853: “We have heard of them as deluded and vicious persons, stirrers-up of crime and disorder, and sure to receive prompt and condign punishment. These reports have, however, not been verified by the subsequent chastisement of the alleged offenders, and now we’re informed that the reason is that they have committed no offense at all.”

In an article “A King Sleeps in Wisconsin” appearing in a publication of the Wisconsin State Historical Society, Conan Bryant Eaton says:  “Surely, at this period James Jesse Strang emerges as a man quite different from the wild-eyed madman or unbridled libertine some writers paint him”

Letters on File

To any person interested in knowing the true facts in the case of Strang, countless letters are on file in historical libraries such as the following from Dr. O.M. Aldrich to Mr. Strang’s sons, Clement, refuting as article printed in the Deseret Evening News of Salt Lake City:

“Now, sir, am I am a stranger to you, you will pardon if I take the liberty of forming your acquaintance. As I was well acquainted with your father, and with all his public acts, in the legislature of Michigan and out of it; and further I will say I was well acquainted with those islands at the time of your father’s locating there and also at his death. [The author of the article being refuted] starts out assuring that the island in 1847, was only inhabited by just, upright, and honorable men; in fact, angels fit only for angelic worlds.

“But sir, I am here to tell you it was the slough hole of eternal hell! The inhabitants were a conglomerate mass of French, Irish, Indian - with one McKinley (not president) as their leader and dealer; and his stock in trade was raw, villainous whiskey! That, sir, was the condition of affairs when your father bought a home for himself and people upon those islands. Not a school-house, habitation for a church, nor in its whole domain the leaf of a primer! What was the condition when you father left? I have traveled somewhat upon those islands with your father, and saw churches, school-houses, farms, and in fact the whole island booming with the products OD earth. I saw a mighty change as by magic; from a barbarous to an intelligent people!

“It is not a question how this is brought about, either by divine power or your father’s native shrewdness! It is not so as stated, that he discouraged all visitors, because, sir, myself (sic) was always a welcome visitor and well known as an agnostic or infidel.

“I saw under the old conditions, the native Indians robbed of their products and labor, lying drunk in their tents: under the new conditions making farms, building homes, schools, and gathering around their own happy firesides. Yes, sir, I saw your father arrested by the United States authorities; taken to Detroit and there tried for robbing the U.S. mails; prosecuted by one John  C. Bates; surrounded by enemies, and as it were, convicted. I saw him stand before that court and plead his own case; I saw him put to route the falsifying of his character; I saw him honorably discharged and returned by the U.S. steamer Michigan. I was personally acquainted with Wentworth and his grievance; I saw him assassinate your father; I with others carried him into McCulloch’s store.

“Well, sir, I am a friend of humanity, and in favor of advancing, either by ecclesiastical power or otherwise. Therefore, I will always cherish the memory of your father; for he believed in bettering the conditions of man! Many obstacles were in his way. If he had been left to follow out the chain of his thoughts, those islands would be fit for Gods to dwell on.!”

Host of Activities

It might be well to note that during the siege of persecutions against him, Strang managed to edit a newspaper, the Northern Islander, carry on a correspondence with over 500 elders, attend nearly all the church conferences, travel hundreds of miles preaching the gospel, and carry on an extensive correspondence with members of his congregation and anyone interested in the church. A portion of this correspondence is preserved in the Coe Collection at Yale University library. Also during that time he succeeded in carrying on three religious controversies through his church paper at one and the same time. But there remain still more records of Strang’s achievements in the short 12 years of his career. He wrote and published a history of the Mackinac region entitled “Ancient and Modern Michil-Mackinac”, a 336 page book entitled the “Book of the Law of the Lord,” and the “Voree Record”, as well as numerous revelations he accredited as having received from the Lord. The year 1855, saw the publication in the Smithsonian Institute’s Annual Report of 1854, of his “Natural History and Cure of the Bite of Serpents, and the Wounds of Poisoned Arrows,” and “On the Amblystoma Luridum, A Salamander Inhabiting Wisconsin.”

In addition to this, he regulated all the affairs of his church and previous to the editing of the Northern Islander, in succession, edited church papers entitled The Voree Herald, Zion’s Reveille, and the Gospel Herald, and under his direction a United States government weather station was maintained at his home. He was also justice of the peace on Beaver Island even thou he had to spend weeks and sometimes months in jail on false charges. He was once even condemned to life imprisonment for saying “I object” to a false charge against him, but was released on a writ of habeas corpus.

It has been established that the Beaver Islanders were, previous to Mormon rule, a barbarous, lawless band of fishermen who harbored renegades fleeing from the mainland. But during Mr. Strang’s rule on the island, things changed greatly for the better. He brought the first civil law to the island, established a quarantine ground, a hospital, schools, churches, a pound for animals found at large, local ordinances regulating gunpowder and licensing of dogs, and miscellaneous health measures. He also passed a law prohibiting the storage of stinking fish within 10 rods of a dwelling house, in streets or along roads, for fishing had always been a major industry. Through his influence roads were built to the interior of the island, some of them still in use today. The sale of whiskey to the Indians, in accordance with United States law, was of course forbidden, but the law was enforced, and justice was given to all men who came to the island, whether Mormon or Gentile. The Mormons and most of the Gentiles willingly accepted these advantages and regulations, but the renegade residents found them increasingly galling and contained their hatred only because of the growing strength of Strang and his followers.

There were those who defended him. The Detroit Free Press of February 14, 1853, says concerning Strang’s law career: “King Strang’s senatorial career has been an eloquent and an honorable one.” And Colonel DeLand of the Saginaw Herald who was also clerk and reporter in the Michigan house of representatives wrote: “We knew Mr. Strang well, and that he was a far better man than he has at times been represented. As a legislator he was vigilant, careful, and just; and some of the best laws of Michigan, made in those days, were made by his pen and influence.” And finally, from the Detroit Advertiser of February 10, 1853: “Mr. Strang’s course as a member of the present legislature has disarmed much of the prejudice which had previously surrounded him. Whatever may be said or thought of the peculiar sect of which he is the local head, throughout his session he has conducted himself with a degree of decorum and propriety which have been equaled by his industry, sagacity, good temper, apparent regards for the true interests of the people, and the obligations of his official oath.”

There was good reason to respect Strang’s ability as a legislator. Among the many bills he introduced were those to organize the counties of Manistique, Alpena, Delta, and Grand Traverse; bills to construct important highways throughout the state; bills on draining and reclaiming lands. His record in the legislature has probably never been equaled by any other representative before or since. Also worthy of note is that he laid a foundation for the present-day bridge across the Straits of Mackinac and the St. Lawrence Seaway.

More Trouble

The summer of 1856 saw troublesome times for the people who lived on the beautiful, emerald isle of the Great Lakes - a time of hatred that flared into open warfare against the Saints. The population at this time numbered over 2,000 Mormons and only a handful of resident Gentile fishermen. Once a year the U.S.S. Michigan visited each American port on the Lakes, but on Monday, June 26, the steamer returned to the harbor at Beaver Island for the second time. James Jesse Strang was heard to say, “They are not coming back for any good.” Even though he doubted the good intentions of Captain Charles W. McBlair who sent the ship’s pilot, Alexander St. Barnard, to bring him on board the steamer, he willingly complied with the captain’s orders.

It was a quarter mile from Strang’s home to the pier. Undoubtedly he felt an ominous apprehension which was evidenced in the fact that he grasped Barnard’s arm as if to steady himself. As they stepped onto the bridge leading to the pier in from of F. Johnson and Co.’s store, two assassins approached silently from the rear, unobserved by Strang, and fired point blank upon him.

The first shot took effect upon the left side of his head, entering a little back of the top of his ear and, rebounding, passed out near the top of his head. This shot brought him down. He staggered against Barnard and desperately tried to maintain his balance. Strang clutched Barnard’s arm and turned so that he saw the assassins as they fired the second and third shots, both finding their mark, one just below the temple, on the right side of the face, and the other near the tenth rib, following the rib about two inches and half where it lodged.

The wounded Mormon prophet recognized in the persons of the assassins, Thomas Bedford and Alexander Wentworth. Wentworth had a revolver and Bedford a horse pistol with which they struck the dying man over the head and face, following which they fled on board the U.S. steamer, weapons still in had, claiming the protection of the captain, who immediately place them in custody.

The approaching assassins had appeared in full view of several of the officers and crew from the dock of the steamer. Also, Dr. H.D. McCulloch, Franklin Johnson, and others were witnesses, but apparently those in the know consented to the act and even his friends were transfixed with horror. Strang was taken up by a few friends, among whom was Wingfield Watson, and some of the officers of the steamer and carried to McCulloch’s store where the surgeon of the steamer made an examination of his wounds and declared recovery hopeless.

The Mormons took out process for the apprehension of Wentworth and Bedford, and the sheriff of the county called on captain McBlair for delivery. The captain refused to turn them over, saying he would take them to Mackinac and deliver them into the hands of the civil authorities of the state there.

And a statement by Alexander St. Bernard regarding the murder of James J. Strang appeared in the Detroit Free Press, June 30, 1889. It is as follows:

“I was an officer on the United States Steamer Michigan for 25 years. She was the first iron boat that navigated the Lakes, and she is in first rate condition yet. During the war we were kept pretty busy cruising between Erie and Chicago. We generally took on wood at Beaver Island. There were between 2,000 and 3,000 Mormons living there then with their leader, King Strang, besides the Gentiles who were mostly fishermen and wood choppers...

“I was well acquainted with the King, for he often came on board the ship. He was a fine looking, sociable sort of a man...

“When we stopped as usual on one of our trips around the Lakes, the complaints [against Mr. Strang] were so bitter that our Captain made up his mind to arrest him again, and he told me to find him and bring him on board the ship. I went to the temple [tabernacle probably, for the temple was never built] first where I was told that he had just gone home. I found him sitting in his room with four of his wives, where he received me very cordially, and when I told him my errand, accompanied me willingly. He linked arms with me and we walked along talking pleasantly. Just as we stepped on the dock and started to walk down the narrow passage between the piles of wood, two of his enemies sprang from behind some hiding place and shot at him. He clung to my arm until they began to pound him with the butt of their pistols, when he let go and fell, leaving me covered with blood from my head to my feet...

“Poor King Strang, he was a fine fellow and deserved a better fate.”

Mr. Strang’s newspaper, the Daily Northern Islander, the only daily newspaper then published north of Grand Rapids, Michigan, in an extra edition dated June 20, 1856, referred to this incident in the following words:  “The steamer left the next day carrying off all the persons supposed to be implicated in the affair, thus affording military protection to murderers, and overthrowing the sovereignty of civil law.”

No Action Taken

Later the U.S. Steamer stopped at Mackinac, and Gabriel Strang, the prophet’s son, writing of the action taken against the assassins there said, ”When the boat left it carried them to Mackinac, 50 miles east, where they were turned over to the civil authorities under a charge of murder. As most of the evidence was that they were over the water and consequently not in the jurisdiction of the state, they were returned to the ship’s officers and carried to Erie, Pa., which is the naval headquarters on the Great Lakes and turned over to the federal courts where the evidence submitted indicated that when the fatal shot was fired, they were on the wharf which was connected with the land which was under state jurisdiction, and they were discharged by the federal court. As they had been discharged by the state court at Mackinac and the constitution of the U.S.. forbids being tried the second time for an offense after being once discharged, they could not be tried again so that was the end of the farce.”

Upon closer examination than is usually given to the case, it appears that his murder plot involved many more persons than Wentworth and Bedford, the reasons for Strang’s death being fear of his growing political power rather than because of personal grievances his assassins held against him. Gabriel Strang wrote, “In 1856, her [U.S. Steamer Michigan’s] annual visit to Beaver Island was in May. A short time later Father received a package through the mail that contained 36 letters all of which were suggestions or instructions concerning getting rid of him... Most of them were from or to civil, naval or military officers. The rest were from enemies who had been friends.”

Who the master-minds were that originated the fantastic murder plot ending a career that was equally incredible probably can never be ascertained, but one thing is sure:  as long as the name Mormon remains in the world, men will remember James Jesse Strang. Even though he returned to Voree near Burlington, Wisconsin, where he died on July 9, 1856, 23 days after being shot, and where he is now buried in a quiet, shady cemetery, his life is constantly revived from century-old newspapers, various letters of the time, records, and documents of a United States district court. Whether he was scholar or charlatan; thief or saint, his history still interests people. It is as though his death lies heavy on the conscience of his fellow man.

 

Lawful Succession

 

The “letter of appointment” was an important step in the succession of leadership in the Church.  Through it the prophet Joseph Smith, Jr., in accordance with God’s command, appointed James J. Strang as the next prophet to lead the Church.  This was done according to the law that had been previously given to the Church.  Concerning the prophet Joseph Smith the law reads:

“2. For behold, verily, verily, I say unto you, that ye have received a commandment for a law unto my church, through him whom I have appointed unto you to receive commandments and revelations from my hand. 3. And this ye shall know assuredly--that there is none other appointed unto you to receive commandments and revelations until he be taken, if he abide in me. 4. But verily, verily, I say unto you, that none else shall be appointed unto this gift except it be through him; for if it be taken from him he shall not have power except to appoint another in his stead. 5. And this shall be a law unto you, that ye receive not the teachings of any that shall come before you as revelations or commandments; 6. And this I give unto you that you may not be deceived, that you may know they are not of me. 7. For verily I say unto you, that he that is ordained of me shall come in at the gate and be ordained as I have told you before, to teach those revelations which you have received and shall receive through him whom I have appointed.” (D. & C. 43)

The law specifically states that none other than Joseph Smith was to receive revelations/commandments for the Church.  No other person was to lead the Church unless something happened to Joseph and then he could only appoint another.  The second key  to receive the prophetic office, was the commandment that he “shall come in at the gate and be ordained as I have told you before.”  Only one ordained under the hand of angels could succeed Joseph Smith.

 

The Letter of Appointment

“My Dear Son: — Your epistle of May 24th; proposing the planting a Stake of Zion in Wisconsin, and the gathering of the Saints there, was duly received, and I, with most of the brethren whose advice I called in, were of opinion that you was deceived by a spirit not of this world, great but not good.  Brother Hyrum, however, thought otherwise, and favored the project, not doubting it was of God. I, however, determined to return you an unfavorable answer for the present. But, Oh! the littleness of man in his best earthy state! Not so the will of the Almighty. God hath ruled it otherwise, and a message from the throne of grace directed me as it hath inspired you,and the faith which thou hast in the Shepherd, the Stone of Israel, hath been repaid to thee a thousand fold, and thou shalt be like unto him; but the flock shall find rest with thee, and God shall reveal to thee his will concerning them.

“I have long felt that my present work was almost done, and that I should soon be called to rule a mighty host, but something whispers me it will be in the land of spirits, where the wicked cease from troubling and the bands of the prisoner fall off. My heart yearns for my little ones, but I know God will be a father to them, and I can claim face to face the fulfillment of promises from him who is a covenant-keeping God, and who sweareth and performeth and faileth not to the uttermost.

“The wolves are upon the scent, and I am waiting to be offered up, if such be the will of God, knowing that though my visage be more marred than that of any, it will be unscarred and  fair when archangels shall place on my brow the double crown of martyr and king in a heavenly world.

“In the midst of darkness and boding danger, the spirit of Elijah came upon me, and I went away to inquire of God how the Church should be saved.

“I was upon the hill of the Temple. The calm father of waters rolled below, changeless and eternal. I beheld a light in the heavens above, and streams of bright light illuminated the firmament, varied and beautiful as the rainbow, gentle, yet rapid as the fierce lightning.

“The Almighty came from his throne of rest. He clothed himself with light as with a garment. He appeared, and moon and stars went out. The earth dissolved in space. I trod on air and was borne on wings Cherubims. The sweetest strains of heavenly music thrilled in my ear, but the notes were low and sad as though they sounded the requiem of martyred Prophets.

“I bowed my head to the earth and asked only wisdom and strength for the Church. The voice of God answered, My servant Joseph, thou hast been faithful over many things and thy reward is glorious; the crown and sceptre are thine, and they wait thee. But thou hast sinned in some things, and thy punishment is very bitter. The whirlwind goeth before, and its clouds are dark, but rest followeth, and to its days there shall be no end. Study the words of the vision for it tarrieth not.

“And now behold my servant James J. Strang hath come to thee from far for truth when he knew it not, and hath not rejected it, but had faith in thee, the Shepherd and Stone of Israel, and to him shall the gathering of the people be, for he shall plant a stake of Zion in Wisconsin, and I will establish it; and there shall my people have peace and rest and shall not be moved, for it shall be established on the prairie on White River, in the lands of Racine and Walworth; and behold my servants James and Aaron shall plant it, for I have given them wisdom, and Daniel shall stand in his lot on the hill beside the river, looking down on the prairie, and shall instruct my people, and shall plead with them face to face.

“Behold my servant James shall lengthen the cords and strengthen the stakes of Zion, and my servant Aaron shall be his counselor, for he hath wisdom in the gospel, and understandeth the doctrines, and erreth not therein.

“And I will have a house built unto me there of stone, and there will I show myself to my people by many mighty works, and the name of the city shall be called Voree, which is, being interpreted, garden of peace, for there shall my people have peace and rest and wax fat and pleasant in the presence of their enemies.

“But I will again stretch out my arm over the river of waters, and on the banks thereof shall the house of my choice be. But now the city of Voree shall be a stronghold of safety to my people, and they that are faithful and obey me I will there give them great prosperity, and such as they have not had before; and unto Voree shall be the gathering of my people, and there shall the oppressed flee for safety, and none shall hurt or molest them.

“And by this shall they know that I have spoken it; the people there and the owners of the land shall show kindness to them, for great calamities are coming on the church, and such as have not been, and if they scatter, the ungodly of the world shall swallow them up, but it they gather to my city of Voree there will I keep them under the shadow of my wings, and the cities from whence my people have been driven shall be purged with a high hand, for I will do it, and my people shall be again restored to their possession; but dark clouds are gathering, for the church is not yet wholly purged.

“And now I command my servants, the Apostles and Priests and Elders of the Church of the Saints, that they communicate and proclaim this, my word, to all the saints of God in all the world, that they may be gathered unto and round about the city of Voree and be saved from their enemies, for I will have a people to serve me.

“And I command my servant Moses Smith that he go unto the saints with whom he is acquainted, and unto many people, and command them in my name to go unto my city of Voree, and gain inheritances therein, for he hath left all for my sake; and I will add unto him many fold if he is faithful, for he knows the land and can testify to them that it is very good.

“So spake the Almighty God of heaven. They duty is made plain, and if thou lackest wisdom, ask of God, in whose hands I trust thee, and he shall give thee unsparingly, for it evil befall me thou shalt lead the flock to pleasant pastures. God sustain thee.”

Joseph Smith

 

"James J. Strang met the requirement of the law that Joseph Smith was to appoint his Successor.  James also had to “come in at the gate” by being ordained by the hands of angels; since there was none on the earth holding the prophetic office." - Samuel West, Elder.


Wednesday, March 5, 2025

A Tribute Poem on the Martyrdom of Joseph Smith

Joseph, Joseph, raise your throat-cry

Above burning torch and fiery eye.

You knew but an echo would reply.

When scarlet tears from weeping wounds

Gather no sympathy on the ground,

The time has come to say goodbye

The time has come to say goodbye.


When there's no help for a widow's son,

Who turned around and wouldn't run

Or be deterred from what he'd begun -

When time stops and help to bed

Retires, as faith has fallen dead,

Your labors must be left undone.

Your labors must be left undone.


When there's no strength left to borrow

To hold the hope-song for the morrow-

Out, brief candle, no more tomorrow!

The smoke-infused morning air,

An opaque veil, shrouds their stares

A curtain draws upon your sorrow

A curtain draws upon our sorrow.


The sounds of metal and wood and rage

Are swallowed in the silence of the age.

Your mouth is silenced in your cage.

Your final words have all been written

The darkness swells; the sun is smitten.

The time has come to turn the page

The time has come to turn the page.


From window breaks your silent songs,

And muffled prayers, addressing wrongs

And the heart-torn longings of countless throngs

Of saints who call you from afar -

The lid now taken from off your jar,

Fly now; your soul to them belongs.

Fly now, your soul to them belongs.


Joseph, Joseph, raise your throat-cry

Above burning torch and fiery eye;

Your life-plea spent and one last sigh,

Then cast your worries to the ground.

Cast your ragged, worn frame down

And lift your soul up to the sky,

Lift your soul up to the sky.


Alexei Christopher Mattanovich

May 13, 2009

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

The Syriac Apocalypse of Peter Paraphrases the Book of Mormon!

Below is the entire text of the Syriac Apocalypse of Peter, which for the upcoming publication The Revelations of the Apostles, is renamed The Third Revelation of Peter. Its composition is thought by most scholars to be too late to actually be from Peter, but it is unquestionably ancient from our standpoint. Yet whoever wrote it must have been inspired, because it is a virtual paraphrase of 2 Nephi 28. Read and compare them for yourself and see!



THE THIRD REVELATION OF PETER

  

Also called The Syriac Apocalypse of Peter, it is found in the collection called The Gospel of the Twelve Apostles, With the Apocalypse of Each of Them. There are claims that it is from a late date, however its content is mutually attested by 2 Nephi in the Book of Mormon, as neither could use the other for a source. See also Nestle (Theo-logische Literaturzeitung­, 1900, 557-559). Compare 2 Nephi 28.

1 And Simon was moved by the Spirit of God: and his appearance and his body were enlarged, and he glorified God; and he wept and said, How great are thy works, O Lord, and all of them thou hast wrought in wisdom.

2 For lo! I see the hosts of God which are a thousand thousands, yea! tens of thousands without number, standing in heaven, and glorifying the lofty throne of the Godhead, exalted above all.

3 And there was sent to me the great angel Michael to be a reminder to me, and I received the Spirit in abundance; and I saw the time that is to be after us, full of offences and evils and sins and lying.

4 And the men in that time will be crafty, perverse and depraved, men that know not God, and understand not the truth;

5 But a few of them shall understand their God, because of his works which they behold daily, those which are established in heaven, and those which are brought forth on earth; and they know the Lord, as if they did not discern him; for this name only is called upon them that are believers.

6 And after a time they will seek to perform miracles, in the name of our Lord Jesus, and they will not be able, because of their little faith; and they call and are not heard, because they do not call on him with all their hearts.

7 But those who are separated from them, few in number, ask and are heard because their hearts speak the truth, and know God, and understand his beloved Son, and do not deny the Spirit.

8 And in this way they perform signs and great works of power; and these also in their wealth and in their faith are not suffered to live; for there will rise up against them bribed judges and also bribed deniers of the faith;

9 And for the name of our Lord they shall be judged and beaten; and they will kill them by bitter and various deaths: and also after that they are killed they shall perform by their death great works of power;

10 And after these things shall have happened, the faith shall fail from the earth and correct teaching shall come to an end: and those who are named as being baptized in our Lord and as confessing his name, shall be more miserable than all men;

11 And they shall trample on the faith and talk perversely and they shall divide our Lord; and in that time there shall be reckoned many teachers, as the Spirit of the Father does not speak in them, and they shall divide our Lord;

12 And the father of lies and the calumniator, that is, Satan, shall enter into them and disturb their minds; and their faith shall fail.

13 And it will come to pass that when they rise up and tear it, and when every man in his place will speak thus: I am superior in the fear of God, and I confess him more correctly! Behold, they shall seek our Lord and shall not find him, and they will call to him and he will not answer them.

14 And the Lord will deliver them to evils and to misery and to wrath and to pillage and to tribute, until they shall ask death for themselves and shall not find a savior, and they shall be enraged and blaspheme against God, and they shall say, 'Because we have the superior knowledge of God, on this account the more have evils tracked our steps';

15 But the few who shall be scattered in the countries, who confess the Son in the way that is right for them to do, of these the Lord shall supply their needs;

16 But those who do not believe in him, and who are called baptized people, shall applaud the heathen, and they shall envy them and shall say, 'Why are these things so, and why has it been given to us on this wise?'

17 And even those who preach among them, on whom the name of the Lord was called, in the leadership over their brethren and in the offices of the Church will be disturbers and self-exalting persons and haters one of another: lovers of money and destroyers of order, and who do not keep the commandments:

18 But they will not love their flocks, and in their days men will appear as sheep who are ravening wolves, and they will eat up the labor of the orphans, and the sustenance of the widows,

19 And every ruler shall pervert justice, and their eyes shall be blinded by bribery, and they shall love vainglory, and because of all these evils that are performed by them, they shall call upon the Lord, and there will be none to answer them,

20 And there will be no Savior for them; because evils are multiplied on the earth, and they have corrupted their ways before the Father in Heaven;

21 And the destroyer shall deliver them up to devastation, and to misery, and to necessity, and there shall rise up against them wasps in the morning and in the evening, and shall oppress them;

22 And men shall see their sons and their daughters and their wives and their revenues made a prey by their enemies; and there will be none that speaks and none that answers because the Holy One wills it and the Lofty One talks with them;

23 And from before him judgment shall go forth, and they shall bring upon them all these evils, and they will rest upon them until they shall return and become one true flock and one holy church,

24 And they shall confess our Lord accordingly as we received from him, and according as we believed in the Son the Life-Giver and Savior of the world; and after this will be one flock and one church and one baptism, true and united:

25 And it will come to pass in that day, that everyone that shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved, and whosoever worships the Comforter shall be delivered. 

Tuesday, October 8, 2024

Racial Language and the Book of Mormon


Racial Language Misunderstood



The book of Mormon claims for itself to contain human errors, repeatedly. When a human takes dictation, they hear things wrong occasionally, or remember them incorrectly. When a person hears, sees or receives knowledge or information by the Spirit and then must translate that into human language, errors also occur. We should not suppose that the work of God absolves us from the conditions of mortality, or that people such as Moses had an easier time receiving revelation or were not required to have as much faith as us. Rather, they show us what is possible for ourselves and revelation comes to them the same way it comes to us.

The Divine intention with written records is not to produce perfection because literalism or fundamentalism is divisive, whereas vagueness allows flexibility of interpretation. If the text is perfect, then individuals will assume the role of authorities on the basis of having had more time with the text. Other individuals will begin to defer to their knowledge and not take the time to seek for themselves. With ambiguity of interpretation, individuals may grow in knowledge and evolve in understanding with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, which is the ultimate goal of scripture - spiritual development, rather than blind obedience. In addition,

God may be limited to interacting with the world through human beings that have the gift of perception, and must work with what he/she/it has to work with. This may not be based on a prophet’s personal righteousness as it is often assumed, as God chooses vessels from various backgrounds, in all their human frailties. The qualifications are submission to learning and growing and allowing transformation. Think of there being rules for interfering similar to ghosts having to talk through psychic mediums. God interferes in the world through the medium of the prophet because of his or her ability to hear and willingness to participate. This idea poses an answer to the problem of Theodicy, which asks why an all powerful God allows suffering. Humanity becomes ultimately responsible for alleviating its own suffering by submitting to the promptings of God.

In areas of translation where Joseph Smith is translating a sentence that sounds similar to what he knows is contained in the King James Version, we should expect a higher probability that he will make assumptions and record the sentence exactly as he remembers it in King James. This is human nature, as when hearing things, we naturally perceive what we expect or are familiar with, even when it is often not the case. We frequently assume what a person means before they finish speaking. Critical arguments against the Book of Mormon assume first that for Joseph to have been a prophet and provided a divine translation, it must be absolutely free of error, a requirement not present in any other human discipline. It also defies logic, because if God wished to prove anything without requiring human beings to tap into the Source of truth, the Holy Spirit, he could write it in the sky with his finger for all to read.

We have instances in the record where mistakes occurred and the scribe struck through the text and made a correction as if quickly while receiving dictation. The accounts record that Joseph would pause if he felt that he was not understood and repeat the word or line. We can expect that he would have to be listening for such a spiritual prompt. If there were times that he caught such mistakes, we can assume that because he is human, that there were times when he failed to listen for such promptings, as episodes in his life and later revelations demonstrate. Additional explanations for the corrections would involve Joseph gaining a better picture of what he was translating as he continued reading and obtained the context. Such context would change the interpretation of a word, as often the same root word can be translated several ways depending on the usage in context.

Are there any reasons to doubt the translation in 2 Nephi 5? Yes. 2 Nephi 5:21 reads, “And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.”

The people that Nephi is referring to are descendants of Israelites, who are not white, and are considered to be not Native Americans, but “among the ancestors of the Native Americans,” who are not black. Immediately, we should note that we are not talking about Europeans and Africans. No one looked at Native Americans and thought they were black. Joseph Smith was acquainted with African slaves, who were black, and he knew the difference.

A flint stone is not black. It is a form of quartz that can range from a dark grey to white. Therefore the properties that we are looking for to compare to a flintstone is something other than its color. A flint is used to make tools because it splits apart in layers or flakes. The Lamanites split off from the other group like flint. Secondly, the sin this verse is referring to is “iniquity,” which word is also rendered “inequity,” or “inequality,” which is condemned throughout the Book of Mormon because it striates society, causing class division, like a Flint. Flint is also used as a striking or cutting tool. The Lamanites are repeatedly referred to throughout the book as a tool of providence to scourge and chasten the Nephites. Scriptural language is euphemistic and symbolic rather than literal.

As the Book of Mormon is a translation, one root word will have several derivatives. The same Nephite root can be rendered as skin, covering or garment. Consider that you have skin, and you also take the skin of animals to use as blankets or to wear as clothing. Therefore you are said to “wear skins.” Later when you make garments out of wool or other material, you are already accustomed to saying the word “skin,” which is also a general word for covering for the person’s own bare skin. We have many examples of this in the English language. In Alma 49:6 (Alma 21:155 RLDS), it uses all three forms of the root in a poetic word-form that we 21st Century Americans call a “play on words.”

“Yea, and they had also prepared themselves with shields and with breastplates, and they had also prepared themselves with garments of skins, yeah, very thick garments to cover their nakedness,” with nakedness rendered by an inversion of “to cover.” This would be similar to writing, “With a bow in my hair, I drew an arrow and shot my bow from the bow of the ship and took a bow.”

In alliteration, we use separate words in close proximity that all start with the same letter. In the example in the text, Alma uses the same exact word in close proximity in three different contexts, giving the words different meanings. Plays on words and other poetic forms are common throughout ancient semitic writings. A Nephite reader of the original would have picked up cues on how the word was to be interpreted for that usage. Remember that Alma wrote in Nephite, not English, and wrote for a Nephite audience, and even though he may have known by revelation that one day a people in the far distant future would read it, he cannot be assumed to know much about their language and customs, so he wrote in the manner of his own people just as prophets we familiar with in the bible did. This poetry would be appreciated by Nephites or ancient Jews, but naturally causes confusion to someone like Joseph Smith, who doesn’t know what to look for when translating it.

Many would, and indeed do, object to the idea of errors in translation on the grounds that David Whitmer described the process of Joseph seeing one word at a time on the stone, which would not go away until he had it recorded correctly, but this is not Joseph’s account, but the account of someone who was anxious to assert the perfection of the record, and though it may bear resemblance to the actual translation process, we have no way to know to to what degree. What we do know is that the book emphatically claims human error and that Joseph did change some words in the second edition, reflecting errors in translation.

For his 1840 reprint of the Book of Mormon, Joseph Smith changed several instances of the word “white” to the word “pure,” suggesting that perhaps all of them should have been rendered this way. In 2 Ne 30:6 (RLDS 12:84), the word “skin” was changed to “garment.” While the the words bear relation to each other and the less appropriate used by accident in a translating and rushed book publication setting, the indicated more correct words lose all racial connotation often implied by the former. After his death, the Utah church changed them back to match the original edition and their understanding of the passages. Some opponents of Joseph Smith and the Restoration like to give the Utah LDS church the final word on the interpretation, but this would lead to false conclusions.

The Utah LDS Church is a contested authority for many reasons, and I give a few for those who need them in order to break the connection to embarrassing and incorrect traditional interpretations. It is only one of several splinter groups of Joseph Smith’s church, and was officially ruled in US court during the Temple Lot Case to not be the legal continuation of the original church, a matter that was heard again by Congress during the Reed Smoot case with a similar conclusion. It can be argued that such was all but admitted by Brigham Young during the Kirtland Temple Suit when he withdrew his case against James J. Strang after reading his Answer and realizing the hopelessness of trying to prove himself the true successor and seeing no profit in being bested by Strang in what would essentially become a debate on public record. Handing over the valuable property to his main rival Strang is nothing short of an admission and a loss.

From the point of view of those who remained members of the original church under James Strang’s presidency, Young and the 9 other apostles who went with him were all legally excommunicated for insurrection and usurping God’s authority. They were determined in US Court to have drastically altered the doctrines of the church, and they did not have a copyright to the Book of Mormon allowing them to print it, and cannot therefore be viewed as authoritative on the interpretation of the text. Nor should their authority be assumed in any other matter taken to affect the entire movement merely because in the twentieth and early part of the twenty-first centuries, their church would become the largest. They did not always comprise the largest group of Mormons, and likely will not always, as projections do not bear this out. The fact that the translator made this correction in a subsequent edition, demonstrates it as the preferred and most authentic word choice, and should alone settle the skin-garment-covering translation issue.

Throughout the book, a running metaphor made by the prophets is “I must rid my garments of the stain of your blood” or “stand with pure garments at the last day.” Examples can be found in: Alma 33:2, Alma 34:36, Alma 13:11, 1 Ne 12:10, Alma 5, 21, Alma 5:27 (see below for full texts). This hails back to a verse in Isaiah 1:18: “Come now, let us settle the matter," says the LORD. "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool.”

The divinity of the Book of Mormon does not rest on whether God punishes people by making them dark complected, even though that idea, offensive as it may be, may be drawn from an absurdly literal reading of the text. Many things in scripture are written in code so that they give one impression to the general public and another altogether to the spiritually enlightened. Dark complexion does not appear as a punishment, as apart from its utility in certain climates or the entirely arbitrary conditions imposed by selfish people, there is no objective benefit of one skin color over another, thus such a literal change cannot be viewed as a blessing or a curse. But ancient writers could plausibly hold any number of irrational opinions on whatever pretense. Such intertribal polemics and negative associations pervade history, especially when that group broke off and went against their cultural norms or because of conflict and resentments over loss of life might be at the receiving end of biased language, even from an otherwise righteous people. That alone might make any group appear loathsome and undesirable to mix with to another, without an inference that God himself is racist. People’s attitudes do not depend, and frequently are entirely without any objective basis in reality.

2 Nephi 26:33 states that God denies none, black and white, bond and free, male and female, etc., but all are invited to partake of his goodness. So if there are ambiguities leading some to justify interpretations of racial division in the above verses, this verse positively asserts equality in God’s view and practice in much more powerful terms than the bible’s assurance that God is no respecter of persons, which contains the same sentiment. And if the God who inspired the Book of Mormon stands firm for equality, Joseph Smith did not fail to uphold His values as leading an early movement with not only fully integrated congregations, but with ordained black ministers, even former slaves, in authority over them. While this progressive inclusivity was not unique in the American religious scene, it was still a noble example of wisdom, equity and bravery, and combined with Smith’s presidential campaign platform on which he proposed to redeem the slaves from bondage two decades prior to Lincoln likely contributed to Smith’s assassination. As Joseph ordained black saints to the priesthood in his congregations, His true successor James Strang did so also, never for a moment considering the existence of any obstacle on the basis of race.

Without any legal claim to the First Presidency, Brigham Young led a splinter group to Utah, re-baptizing them along the way, reversed Joseph’s ordinations of black men, stripping them of honors bestowed by their prophet in the church they believed in and instituted the policy of discrimination that Mormonism has since been known for and the doctrines offered to justify it. He also is responsible for reversing Joseph's second edition word changes that clarified that the controversial verses were speaking idiomatically of garments rather than literal flesh in order to preserve their doctrines of exclusion. Such misguided interpretations and theological justifications, though abhorrent, may by discernment be appropriately taken as signifying their adherents’ level of spiritual attunement or unity with God and a sign of where the valid authority lies, so as not to waste the silver lining in a sky of gloom. I do not wish to make more of it than this, that the controversy of racial discrimination and the priesthood belongs to the branches descending from Young and not Joseph, and are not anyone else’s burden to bear, and the absolute belief in the supremacy of that institution and all of its traditions to the exclusion of all other sources of light, knowledge and welcome correction is not derived from anything taught by Joseph Smith.

In Jacob Chapter 3 we have an instance in verses 5 and 8 where skins should be replaced with garments. “O my brethren, I fear that unless ye shall repent of your sins that their garments will be whiter than yours, when ye shall be brought with them before the throne of God.” In verse 9, the same root word appears to be used to refer to actual skin in a rebuke against racism among the Nephites who are falling into corruption and inequality, when he says, “Revile no more against them because of the darkness of their skins/garments, neither revile against them because of their filthiness, but ye shall remember your own filthiness, how theirs came because of their fathers,” but this instance likewise works with either understanding.

For one thing, the speaker uses the same word filthiness to refer to both the Nephites and the Lamanites, making it difficult to infer the intention of a racial slur by this word in the Nephite language without even a comparable synonym in our own. Are they unclean in their metaphorical garments because of sin and the failure to wash them in Christ’s blood because their fathers led them astray and did not teach them, or does this reference refer to the melanin in their skin or the literally unwashed animal skins they wear. Nephites discriminating against Lamanites for being mixed blood and having darker skin and features should not be wholly surprising if that is what one interprets here, but it should regardless not be taken as a fore drawn conclusion, nor a view God shares if they did, as scripture teaches us as much from the mistakes of God’s people as from their righteous acts. It should be noted that the book does not specifically mention other natives in the land, but their presence may be inferred due to the sudden and inexplicable increase in the Lamanite population, that they intermarried with natives where Nephites maintained what they considered ethnic purity. Jacob in this chapter berates the Nephites for their pride in materiality, in building a high society marked by fine clothing and inequality of the rich and poor, and looking down on Lamanites because they did not bathe as frequently and wore simple loincloths. Jacob assures them that this has no bearing on their worthiness. Even though the Lamanites had left the true faith they had brought over from Israel, they were in better shape at this time than the Nephites who were not living by theirs, notwithstanding their pretentious observances.

Further Examples of Idiom in the Book of Mormon to refer to one’s standing before God:

ULDS Alma 24:12-15 (RLDS Alma 14:34-40) 12 Now, my best beloved brethren, since God hath taken away our stains, and our swords have become bright, then let us stain our swords no more with the blood of our brethren. 13 Behold, I say unto you, Nay, let us retain our swords that they be not stained with the blood of our brethren; for perhaps, if we should stain our swords again they can no more be washed bright through the blood of the Son of our great God, which shall be shed for the atonement of our sins. 15 Oh, how merciful is our God! And now behold, since it has been as much as we could do to get our stains taken away from us, and our swords are made bright, let us hide them away that they may be kept bright, as a testimony to our God at the last day, or at the day that we shall be brought to stand before him to be judged, that we have not stained our swords in the blood of our brethren since he imparted his word unto us and has made us clean thereby.

In Alma, 24, though he refers to getting their physical swords of battle stained in the blood of their foes, the author switches back and forth to using the sword as a metaphor for their souls, providing the “swords” spotless at the last day. “Brightness” means clean, pure and holy.

1 Nephi 12:10 And these twelve ministers whom thou beholdest shall judge thy seed. And, behold, they are righteous forever; for because of their faith in the Lamb of God their garments are made white in his blood.

Alma 5:21 I say unto you, ye will know at that day that ye cannot be saved; for there can no man be saved except his garments are washed white; yea, his garments must be purified until they are cleansed from all stain, through the blood of him of whom it has been spoken by our fathers, who should come to redeem his people from their sins. 22 And now I ask of you, my brethren, how will any of you feel, if ye shall stand before the bar of God, having your garments stained with blood and all manner of filthiness? Behold, what will these things testify against you? 23 Behold will they not testify that ye are murderers, yea, and also that ye are guilty of all manner of wickedness? 24 Behold, my brethren, do ye suppose that such an one can have a place to sit down in the kingdom of God, with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob, and also all the holy prophets, whose garments are cleansed and are spotless, pure and white? 27 Have ye walked, keeping yourselves blameless before God? Could ye say, if ye were called to die at this time, within yourselves, that ye have been sufficiently humble? That your garments have been cleansed and made white through the blood of Christ, who will come to redeem his people from their sins?

As can be seen the culture and religious context of the Book of Mormon writers use the covering of skins or garments as symbolic of their worthiness, or the soul, and from extended literary sources, their priesthood, which was also an inherent and essential component of their covenant as God’s people and indicative of their standing in the next life’s Kingdom of God, and they held a preoccupation with concepts of staining and cleansing, from which their concept of the atonement of Christ derived. From either the writer or the translator, the word “skin” could as easily have appeared in the text in place of “garment,” referring to the skins that clothes are made of, and would have meant the same to a reader familiar with their ancient cultural context. “That your skins have been cleansed and made white through the blood of Christ.” Blood does not in reality make anything white, not garments, not swords, and not human skin, so why the literalist reading that assumes we are speaking of ethnicity in any of these passages? Upon a more thorough examination it is not mandated from the text itself, but from the preoccupation of modern society in the aftermath of some of the most barbaric and cruel practices being implemented in full scale, and with some of the most vicious of justifications meant to indoctrinate minds into denying basic humanity. You may rightly wonder, as I have, why the Lord’s inspired writers were not given the foresight to anticipate modern evils and choose a metaphor that could not be so hurtfully misconstrued. While I can’t answer absolutely, other than pointing out the assumptions the question makes about what is and is not subject to prophetic foreknowledge, I was led to admit the reality that all metaphors are subject to being misconstrued, and the history of Bible interpretation and resulting conflict proves that all scriptures can be misconstrued as well, and if there is a God, the ambiguity must be part of His plan, possibly to create room for personal growth through the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Considering the prevalence of horrendous crime and suffering prevalent in our world, such as should make us ever the more eternally compassionate for all our fellow beings, the possibility that this ambiguity was allowed as a snare for the wicked to humble them before the judgment bar having revealed the corruption in their hearts is not without plausibility.

While we cannot infer that authors over 2000 years ago should be aware of what will be sensitive topics in our age. The lack of such sensitivity is evidence of its ancient date as even throughout the world today there are myriad interactions between people of all nations, kindreds, tongues and people who speak to and about each other in the context of racial differences, neither intending nor taking offense by it common here, for few of which have the sensitivity and the rawness that lingers here in the united states; and well we should, for European settlers had one of the largest and most pervasive and harsh systems of slavery, the longest running and the most cruelly supported with rhetoric, requiring an awful bloody war of rebellion to pry from its grasp of control. It was replaced with a century of segregation accompanied by an illegal and unchecked reign of terror against a people seeking the basic necessities and dignities of life, and after the presumed equality is belatedly enforced, the ways of oppression and systemic violence are perpetuated openly, yet denied by their fellow citizens. It is entirely fitting that our preoccupation with these issues, as a consequence of unparalleled societal evil, is unmatched in all history and in all the world. Thus while we cannot celebrate outdated metaphors as impossible to our minds to overlook as foreign words that resemble profanities, we can look on them with academic maturity without giving in to projecting upon ancient people of another time, culture, language and human experience the consequences of our own works of evil, while simultaneously supporting in Christian love those among us whose traumas are triggered by negative associations, seeing emotions as valid and genuine.

Alma 13:11 Therefore they were called after this holy order, and were sanctified, and their garments were washed white through the blood of the Lamb. 12 Now they, after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God, could not look upon sin save it were with abhorrence; and there were many, exceedingly great many, who were made pure and entered into the rest of the Lord their God.

In this section, Alma writes of the garments being sanctified of the Spirit being Pure, White and Spotless and it is the sin which is looked upon with abhorrence, giving us a further key that the filthiness spoken of the Lamanites in previous verses and similar context was not their skin color, as again they were of the same ethnic group as the Nephites, but unlike most of the world which formes social identity in connection with blood relation, we are speaking of a “peculiar people,” whose social identity was primarily a covenant with God and each other.

Alma 34:36 And this I know, because the Lord hath said he dwelleth not in unholy temples, but in the hearts of the righteous doth he dwell; yea, and he has also said that the righteous shall sit down in his kingdom, to go no more out; but their garments should be made white through the blood of the Lamb.


Let’s read the chapter as it might have been translated with alternate derivatives.

2 Nephi 5:

20 Wherefore, the word of the Lord was fulfilled which he spake unto me, saying that: Inasmuch as they will not hearken unto thy words they shall be cut off from the presence of the Lord. And behold, they were cut off from his presence. 21 And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their inequality. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were pure, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be beguiling unto my people the Lord God did cause a covering of darkness to come upon them. 22 And thus saith the Lord God: I will cause that they shall be loathsome/abhorrent unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities. 23 And cursed shall be the seed of him that mixeth with their seed; for they shall be cursed even with the same cursing. And the Lord spake it, and it was done. 24 And because of their cursing which was upon them they did become an idle people, full of mischief and subtlety, and did seek in the wilderness for beasts of prey.

To further support this reading, we turn to the Joseph Smith Translation Genesis 9:29-30 - “And Noah awoke from his wine and knew what his youngest son had done to him and he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, "Blessed be the Lord God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant, and a veil of darkness shall cover him, that he shall be known among all men.”

We see a cursed one being known by a veil of darkness. This part is Joseph Smith’s addition to the text of Genesis and is a direct parallel to the verse in 2 Nephi 2:21, which does not carry the implication that we are speaking of race or skin color. The Joseph Smith Translation portion of Genesis is the key to interpreting the meaning of the Book of Mormon text. We interpret metaphorically rich ancient text as being about race only when we read it with a 21st Century lens.

Of concern to the writer is the difference between the two peoples in procuring food. The Nephites were planters and harvesters, the Lamanites were meat eaters. This is the plausible reason why the writer viewed them as idle and loathsome. Agriculture requires a greater amount of toil and patience to produce food than hunting and gathering. It requires systemization and technology, and if more sophisticated. Remember that the Nephites and Lamanites are cousins, not two different races.


The Mark of the Lamanites?


Alma chapter 3 (ULDS) describes the Amlicites rebelling against the Nephites and joining the Lamanites to become Lamanites. It states three times that they were cursed of God, like the Lamanites, that they marked themselves knowing that it fulfilled the curse of God and didn’t care and that the mark was a mark of red upon their foreheads. It was not a full body mark, and it was not a literal skin of blackness. Alma 3:4 also states that this was “after the manner of the Lamanites” or the same mark, and that it was to distinguish themselves from the Nephites. Therefore, the Lord placing a mark on them is actually more subtle, being that the Lord caused them to desire to distinguish themselves by a form of body modification or tattoo on their foreheads, making them easily distinguishable to Nephites, accomplishing the Lord’s desire to keep them separate from Nephites so that they don’t corrupt them with their ways. However, anyone who repented was accepted among the Nephites and the mark was removed. Thereafter, they were called Nephites. It says the curse was lifted also. Elaborating on verse 9, verse 10 explains that “mingling seed” indicates “being led away by Lamanites” rather than simply having children with them. It means actually moving among them, raising one’s children and adopting their ways, but most importantly breaking or trading one's own societal covenant for another, which for ancient Israelites would be viewed with abhorrence.

This rationale makes far more sense, even in 1830, when nobody thought that people could become black or white simply by sinning or repenting.


Conclusion of Book of Mormon Race Theories


The reader can decide if certain parts of the Book of Mormon are objectionable. Certainly, the bible also has many, as do the Qur’an and the Book of Adam and Eve, demonstrating the Book of Mormon’s authenticity as an ancient Semitic work. While the passagest bring to mind a context informed by 19th century America, the passages themselves do not fit in or make sense in this context, but are actually the more comically or uncomfortably out of place there. 

If we refrain from a foregone conclusion about Joseph Smith being a false prophet, we see that these passages are consistent with a translated sacred book of ancient date, we can then look at the verses in question for the most likely possible interpretation. This would be the methodology for interpreting a work whose authenticity was not in question. Individuals who derive a racist interpretation draw it from the racism they bring to the text, as Paul says that all things seem pure unto the pure, while all things seem corrupt unto the corrupt. But those uncontrollably triggered by the passages are innocent victims of past social trauma from which scars have yet to heal, and should be loved, honored and respected as such, and these issues whether derived from mistake or error or inconvenient coincidence, should be handled with sensitivity and care as a potential cause of real distress. 


See Evidences of the Book of Mormon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV8QN7bIeEE&t=1989s


Notes: compare similar passages in Isaiah, the Koran, and the Book of Adam and Eve (Conflict with Satan) for passages using the idiom of dark skin, as well as later revelations in the Restoration. 


Notes: see Mormon Yeshiva Article on Racism in the Book of Mormon:

https://mormonyeshiva.blogspot.com/2018/01/are-you-white-and-delightsome.html?fbclid=IwAR2w3HtUwp67DMhIgLHeAJpqkN85pTi1CSBbaac1DlZj07U2uitv07zEnr8&m=1


2 Enoch 6 And those men took me and led me up onto the second heaven, and showed me darkness, greater than earthly darkness, and there I saw prisoners hanging, watched, awaiting the great and boundless judgment.

7 And these angels (spirits) were dark-looking,[ Spiritual darkness in appearance. See Adam 1:2-3, ULDS 2 Nephi 5:21 / RLDS 4 Nephi 33-35.] more than earthly darkness, and incessantly making weeping through all hours.


Adam 1:2 And to the north of the garden there is a sea of water, clear and pure to the taste, unlike anything else; so that, through the clearness thereof, one may look into the depths of the earth.

3 And when a man washes himself in it, he becomes clean of the cleanness thereof, and white of its whiteness—even if he were dark.


“My Father sends Michael and the other angels and they place a mark upon the foreheads of the sinners. That mark is as black as a sack. When that sign appears, immediately my Father sends his angels and they separate them, a father from his son, a son from the hand of his father, a mother being taken from the hand of her daughter, a daughter being taken from the hand of her mother, a brother from his brother, a wife from her husband. Very single rank being separated one from the other. All the sinners stand on the left hand of the true judge, the right will stand on his right hand.” - Investiture of the Archangel Michael 4:7-9


With these verified, authentic ancient semitic references to skins of blackness, marks of blackness, etc, it becomes less tenable to isolate any of these works for denunciation or to insist upon a literal reading of the text, particularly that of the idiom rich Book of Mormon. Subsequent conclusions that it MUST mean what it says literally, that it MUST refer to race and ethnicity as humans currently understand it, and that the book therefore must be a nineteenth century hoax that must be interpreted in a nineteenth century language language context, and is thus ungodly, is unjustified wishful thinking and untenable on reflection. 

In fact, the appearance of rather strange concepts that otherwise stand out from the teachings of Joseph Smith or the early Mormon movement on the whole are rather indicators of authenticity. If believers were to rather see the book as an authentic revelation from God, obtained as the book suggests by godly methods of spiritual discernment (something never claimed to be without error or easily interpreted) rather than the wisdom of the world, which God says is foolishness, it would stand then to not look at these questions as ones related to whether the book should be taken seriously, but rather what the text could mean. If we take cues as to meaning from these other ancient sources, we come to conclusions that lead away from both the race issue and literal interpretations altogether.


Sunday, August 18, 2024

RESPONSIBLE MINISTRY, BENEFICIAL TRUTH

No one values what they are not ready for. If you doubt it, deliver ten trucks of free ice cream to the lawn of an ice cream shop owner with no extra space in the freezer. They absolutely value the amount and specific types of the ice cream they ordered, which is the ice cream they are low on and need to have on hand to sell, as they value owning a well stocked and efficient business with a good reputation, and they value profit they earn by having them, and if their order is delayed, they will be distressed as they see dissatisfied customers leave without spending money on what they wanted. But multiplying the amount of the same thing they value in a specific quantity and type and the wrong timing does not multiply the value of it; in fact, apart from adding them no resale value at all, several tons of melted cream will also destroy the value of their lawn and property, not to mention rob them of the value of their own time in dealing with the huge non-blessing that it is. This principle applies to the arrival of the perfect romantic partner when you are not ready, say when you are still struggling with making a failing marriage work and the added complication multiplies the legal costs and emotional distress by multiplying the challenges of navigating the divorce while starting the new relationship on rocky ground instead of starting it one year later after a mature and responsible conclusion to the first marriage, arrived at on its own merits and terms. It can even apply to having unexpected money show up out of the blue, say for instance showing up in December where it puts you into a higher tax bracket while suddenly robbing you of huge subsidies you were depending on qualifying for, whereas if the money arrived in January, you could plan the whole year accordingly. In some cases the subsidies people have lost amounted to more than the unplanned money they received, and as such the money was a curse and not a blessing. This principle also applies to knowledge, because knowledge you are not ready to accept and use is not a blessing, and may be a curse too. Knowledge of good and evil, if insufficient to produce conviction to overcome character deficiencies, may only serve to increase one’s accountability for bad choices, whereas the same knowledge dispensed in measured quantities and the right timing would be of inestimable worth. If the range of our gaze is only to the extent of identifying right and wrong, truth and untruth, and opportunities to speak it and not penetrating into the lives and circumstances of those we attempt to thrust it upon, then we are self absorbed, seeking only our own blessing and not theirs, serving ourselves and not them, and certainly not God. And if we think that shortsighted efforts that are not calculated to benefit others can ever bless us, then we have received the wrong kinds of knowledge, or at the wrong times, in the wrong proportions or in the wrong order, and in that wrong order have formed our values.